You already have your own forked copy of the dipy repository, by
following Making your own copy (fork) of DIPY. You have Set up your fork. You have configured
git by following Configure git. Now you are ready for some real work. In what follows we’ll refer to the upstream dipy Don’t use your When you are starting a new set of changes, fetch any changes from trunk,
and start a new feature branch from that. Make a new branch for each separable set of changes — “one task, one
branch” (ipython git workflow). Name your branch for the purpose of the changes - e.g.
If you can possibly avoid it, avoid merging trunk or any other branches into
your feature branch while you are working. If you do find yourself merging from trunk, consider Rebasing on trunk Ask on the DIPY mailing list if you get stuck. Ask for code review! This way of working helps to keep work well organized, with readable history.
This in turn makes it easier for project maintainers (that might be you) to see
what you’ve done, and why you did it. See linux git workflow and ipython git workflow for some explanation. It may sound strange, but deleting your own First make sure you have done Linking your repository to the upstream repo. From time to time you should fetch the upstream (trunk) changes from github: This will pull down any commits you don’t have, and set the remote branches to
point to the right commit. For example, ‘trunk’ is the branch referred to by
(remote/branchname) When you are ready to make some changes to the code, you should start a new
branch. Branches that are for a collection of related edits are often called
‘feature branches’. Making an new branch for each set of related changes will make it easier for
someone reviewing your branch to see what you are doing. Choose an informative name for the branch to remind yourself and the rest of us
what the changes in the branch are for. For example Generally, you will want to keep your feature branches on your public github
fork of dipy. To do this, you git push this new branch up to your
github repo. Generally (if you followed the instructions in these pages, and by
default), git will have a link to your github repo, called In git >= 1.7 you can ensure that the link is correctly set by using the
From now on git will know that Make some changes See which files have changed with Check what the actual changes are with Add any new files to version control To commit all modified files into the local copy of your repo,, do
To push the changes up to your forked repo on github, do a When you are ready to ask for someone to review your code and consider a merge: Go to the URL of your forked repo, say
Use the ‘Branch’ dropdown menu near the top left of the page to
select the branch with your changes: Click on the ‘New pull request’ button near the ‘Branch’ dropdown. Enter a title for the set of changes, and some explanation of what you’ve
done. Say if there is anything you’d like particular attention for - like a
complicated change or some code you are not happy with. If you don’t think your request is ready to be merged, just say so in your
pull request message. This is still a good way of getting some preliminary
code review. (Note the colon If you want to work on some stuff with other people, where you are all
committing into the same repository, or even the same branch, then just
share it via github. First fork dipy into your account, as from Making your own copy (fork) of DIPY. Then, go to your forked repository github page, say
Click on the ‘Settings’ on the right, then ‘Collaborators’ on the left, and add anyone else to the repo as a
collaborator: Now all those people can do: Remember that links starting with Your collaborators can then commit directly into that repo with the
usual: To see a graphical representation of the repository branches and
commits: To see a linear list of commits for this branch: You can also look at the network graph visualizer for your github
repo. Finally the Fancy log output Let’s say you thought of some work you’d like to do. You
Update the mirror of trunk and Make a new feature branch called
At this stage you consider merging trunk into your feature branch, and you
remember that this here page sternly advises you not to do that, because the
history will get messy. Most of the time you can just ask for a review, and not
worry that trunk has got a little ahead. But sometimes, the changes in trunk
might affect your changes, and you need to harmonize them. In this situation
you may prefer to do a rebase. rebase takes your changes (A, B, C) and replays them as if they had been made to
the current state of See rebase without tears for more detail. To do a rebase on trunk: In this situation, where you are already on branch When all looks good you can delete your backup branch: If it doesn’t look good you may need to have a look at
Recovering from mess-ups. If you have made changes to files that have also changed in trunk, this may
generate merge conflicts that you need to resolve - see the git rebase man
page for some instructions at the end of the “Description” section. There is
some related help on merging in the git user manual - see resolving a merge. Sometimes, you mess up merges or rebases. Luckily, in git it is
relatively straightforward to recover from such mistakes. If you mess up during a rebase: If you notice you messed up after the rebase: If you forgot to make a backup branch: Note Do this only for your own feature branches. There’s an embarassing typo in a commit you made? Or perhaps the you
made several false starts you would like the posterity not to see. This can be done via interactive rebasing. Suppose that the commit history looks like this: and Rewrite the commit message for Combine the commits We do as follows: This will open an editor with the following text in it: To achieve what we want, we will make the following changes to it: This means that (i) we want to edit the commit message for
Git will then immediately bring up an editor for editing the commit
message. After revising it, we get the output: and the history looks now like this: If it went wrong, recovery is again possible as explained above.Development workflow
Workflow summary
master
branch, as
“trunk”.
master
branch for anything. Consider deleting it.bugfix-for-issue-14
or refactor-database-code
.Consider deleting your master branch
master
branch can help reduce
confusion about which branch you are on. See deleting master on github for
details.Update the mirror of trunk
git fetch upstream
upstream/master
- and if there have been commits since
you last checked, upstream/master
will change after you do the fetch.Make a new feature branch
add-ability-to-fly
, or
bugfix-for-issue-42
.# Update the mirror of trunk
git fetch upstream
# Make new feature branch starting at current trunk
git branch my-new-feature upstream/master
git checkout my-new-feature
origin
. You push
up to your own repo on github with:git push origin my-new-feature
--set-upstream
option:git push --set-upstream origin my-new-feature
my-new-feature
is related to the
my-new-feature
branch in the github repo.The editing workflow
Overview
# hack hack
git add my_new_file
git commit -am 'NF - some message'
git push
In more detail
git status
(see git status).
You’ll see a listing like this one:# On branch ny-new-feature
# Changed but not updated:
# (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
# (use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
#
# modified: README
#
# Untracked files:
# (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
#
# INSTALL
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
git diff
(git diff).git add new_file_name
(see
git add).git commit -am 'A commit message'
. Note the -am
options to
commit
. The m
flag just signals that you’re going to type a
message on the command line. The a
flag — you can just take on
faith — or see why the -a flag? — and the helpful use-case
description in the tangled working copy problem. The git commit manual
page might also be useful.git
push
(see git push).Ask for your changes to be reviewed or merged
http://github.com/your-user-name/dipy
.Some other things you might want to do
Delete a branch on github
git checkout master
# delete branch locally
git branch -D my-unwanted-branch
# delete branch on github
git push origin :my-unwanted-branch
:
before test-branch
. See also: remove remote branch.Several people sharing a single repository
http://github.com/your-user-name/dipy
git clone git@githhub.com:your-user-name/dipy.git
git@
use the ssh protocol and are
read-write; links starting with git://
are read-only.git commit -am 'ENH - much better code'
git push origin master # pushes directly into your repo
Explore your repository
gitk --all
git log
lg
alias will give you a reasonable text-based
graph of the repository.Rebasing on trunk
cool-feature
. At this stage trunk is at some commit, let’s call it E. Now
you make some new commits on your cool-feature
branch, let’s call them A, B,
C. Maybe your changes take a while, or you come back to them after a while. In
the meantime, trunk has progressed from commit E to commit (say) G: A---B---C cool-feature
/
D---E---F---G trunk
trunk
. In other words, in this case, it takes the
changes represented by A, B, C and replays them on top of G. After the rebase,
your history will look like this: A'--B'--C' cool-feature
/
D---E---F---G trunk
# Update the mirror of trunk
git fetch upstream
# go to the feature branch
git checkout cool-feature
# make a backup in case you mess up
git branch tmp cool-feature
# rebase cool-feature onto trunk
git rebase --onto upstream/master upstream/master cool-feature
cool-feature
, the last
command can be written more succinctly as:git rebase upstream/master
git branch -D tmp
Recovering from mess-ups
git rebase --abort
# reset branch back to the saved point
git reset --hard tmp
# look at the reflog of the branch
git reflog show cool-feature
8630830 cool-feature@{0}: commit: BUG: io: close file handles immediately
278dd2a cool-feature@{1}: rebase finished: refs/heads/my-feature-branch onto 11ee694744f2552d
26aa21a cool-feature@{2}: commit: BUG: lib: make seek_gzip_factory not leak gzip obj
...
# reset the branch to where it was before the botched rebase
git reset --hard cool-feature@{2}
Rewriting commit history
git log --oneline
eadc391 Fix some remaining bugs
a815645 Modify it so that it works
2dec1ac Fix a few bugs + disable
13d7934 First implementation
6ad92e5 * masked is now an instance of a new object, MaskedConstant
29001ed Add pre-nep for a copule of structured_array_extensions.
...
6ad92e5
is the last commit in the cool-feature
branch. Suppose we
want to make the following changes:
13d7934
to something more sensible.2dec1ac
, a815645
, eadc391
into a single one.# make a backup of the current state
git branch tmp HEAD
# interactive rebase
git rebase -i 6ad92e5
pick 13d7934 First implementation
pick 2dec1ac Fix a few bugs + disable
pick a815645 Modify it so that it works
pick eadc391 Fix some remaining bugs
# Rebase 6ad92e5..eadc391 onto 6ad92e5
#
# Commands:
# p, pick = use commit
# r, reword = use commit, but edit the commit message
# e, edit = use commit, but stop for amending
# s, squash = use commit, but meld into previous commit
# f, fixup = like "squash", but discard this commit's log message
#
# If you remove a line here THAT COMMIT WILL BE LOST.
# However, if you remove everything, the rebase will be aborted.
#
r 13d7934 First implementation
pick 2dec1ac Fix a few bugs + disable
f a815645 Modify it so that it works
f eadc391 Fix some remaining bugs
13d7934
, and (ii) collapse the last three commits into one. Now we
save and quit the editor.[detached HEAD 721fc64] FOO: First implementation
2 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
[detached HEAD 0f22701] Fix a few bugs + disable
1 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/my-feature-branch.
0f22701 Fix a few bugs + disable
721fc64 ENH: Sophisticated feature
6ad92e5 * masked is now an instance of a new object, MaskedConstant